“ ...
a nation that fails to attend to the needs of those less fortunate
among us risks its soul.” Donald Berwick
“
... helping others means
more than just getting ahead yourself.” Michelle Obama (about
President Obama’s philosophy of living and governing)
“I’m
not voting for Obama. I don’t care about any of those other
issues,” my friend said. “They don’t matter to me.”
I
do care. A lot. Elections have consequences.
At the conclusion of a
heated discussion of the ways in which President Obama has
disappointed -- even enraged -- peace
activists with his actions (and inaction) regarding national defense,
foreign policy and civil liberties, my friend announced that nothing
would make him vote for Obama this year, not even critical social
policy issues.
After
that meeting I was inspired to list the reasons why I WILL be voting
for President Obama this November.
I
may have inadvertently omitted an important point or two from the
list below, but I hope my message is clear: As serious as
President Obama’s shortcomings are in the areas listed above, it is
apparent from Mitt Romney’s promises we can expect no respite in
these areas from a Romney administration. His nomination
acceptance speech was filled with what has been called “global
hegemon” and “neocon bellicosity,” and military action
involving Iran is much more likely if he is elected president.
AND the potential losses in
crucial domestic areas are too great to risk. Supreme
Court
If
Mitt Romney becomes President, he will be choosing the next one, two
or three Supreme Court Justices. Appointing Supreme Court
Justices may be the single most significant action any President
takes. It profoundly steers law, public policy and culture for
perpetuity. If progressive voters don’t go to the polls to
re-elect President Obama they might find themselves losing rights and
privileges that they have taken for granted their entire lives.
Congress
A Romney victory would
likely bring with it a large GOP majority in the House and quite
possibly a Republican Senate as well, and hence a tsunami of
regressive legislation.
Health
Care
Affordable
Care Act Democrats,
under President Obama, believe health care is a right and want all
Americans to be covered by health insurance. The Affordable
Care Act (ACA) does not achieve that goal but it moves the ball a lot
closer to the goal line than it was before the ACA was enacted.
Universal coverage is not a goal for Republicans. Mitt Romney
has vowed to begin dismantling the ACA as one of his first actions as
President. This would mean the return of the “donut hole,”
the loss of coverage for adult children up to the age of 26 and those
with pre-existing or high risk conditions, the loss of free
preventive exams, the loss of contraception with no co-pay and the
reinstatement of lifetime and annual limits on coverage.
Medicare
President Obama’s proposed
Medicare savings are achieved through payment reductions to vendors,
service delivery innovations and increased efforts to reduce fraud,
waste and abuse. There will be no reduction in benefits to
seniors under his plan and the money saved will be turned back into
the health insurance system, delaying insolvency and extending the
fiscal security of Medicare for eight years. The Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) agrees that the ACA actually reduces the deficit.
Mitt Romney will raise the
eligibility age to 67 and turn Medicare into a voucher system in
which each patient will receive a fixed amount of money with which to
purchase private insurance. The patient will have to make up
the difference between the amount of the voucher and the actual cost
of the insurance. Insurance premium cost is expected to
increase more steeply than the size of vouchers. A CBO
analysis estimates that seniors would pay 61% of their healthcare
costs out of pocket by 2022 (as opposed to 27% if Medicare stays as
is). The money saved from current levels of Medicare spending
under the Romney plan would be spent on tax cuts for the rich.
Medicaid
Mitt Romney would eliminate the
existing matching-grant financing structure of Medicaid and would
instead give each state a predetermined block grant. States
would be forced to reduce their spending and lower the size of their
Medicaid programs by such measures as cutting payment rates for
doctors, hospitals, or nursing homes; reducing the scope of benefits
covered; or limiting eligibility. An
Urban Institute analysis of the Ryan budget proposal from last year
found block grants would lead states to drop between 14 million and
27 million people from Medicaid by 2021 and cut reimbursements to
health care providers by 31%.
Social
Security
Mitt
Romney’s Social Security plan would, by 2032, raise the normal
retirement age from 67 to 70, and adopt “progressive price
indexing” which would reduce the future growth rate of benefits for
the top 60 percent of earners. (Their initial retirement benefits
would partly reflect inflation but not overall wage growth during
their careers.) Wealthy retirees would get fewer benefits.
Vice-President Biden has pledged, “Number one, I guarantee you,
flat guarantee you, there will be no changes in Social Security.”
LGBT Rights
President Obama believes
in a future where no one is denied rights because of who they are or
whom they love. He supports LGBT rights including the
Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and marriage equality and
the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOM). Mitt Romney
opposes ENDA and will actively push for a constitutional amendment to
take away the rights of states to voluntarily extend marriage
equality to same-sex couples. The GOP platform calls for a ban on
marriage equality nationwide.
Immigration
President Obama supports
creating a legal immigration system that reflects American values and
diverse needs. In contrast to Mitt Romney who wants
undocumented immigrants to “self-deport,” the Obama
administration has developed a program of deferred action for
childhood arrivals, a discretionary determination to defer removal
action of an individual as an act of prosecutorial discretion so that
children of undocumented immigrants can work, attend school or serve
in the US military without fear of deportation. Mitt Romney has
stated he would repeal the Dream Act -- which President
Obama supports -- should it pass and the GOP platform
states that federal funding should be denied to universities that
provide instate tuition rates to illegal aliens.
Equal Pay for Women
President Obama supports
women’s rights to equal pay and signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay
Act as one his first acts as President. It took Mitt Romney
days to say he would not repeal the Act.
Reproductive
Justice
Unlike
Mitt Romney who as recently as the Fall of 2011 expressed support for
legislation which would declare a fertilized egg a person and vowed
to defund Planned Parenthood, President Obama supports a woman’s
right to reproductive freedom including access to safe and legal
abortions and birth control. To this end, the ACA includes a
provision now in effect that contraception be covered by health
insurance without co-pay. This year's GOP platform calls for a
federal ban on abortion without an exception for rape or incest,
supports a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorses
legislation to make clear that the 14th Amendment’s protections
apply to unborn children. The Romney campaign website states
that “the right next step is for the Supreme Court to overturn Roe
v. Wade.”
Education
Obama recognizes the
importance of education in assuring individuals are self-sufficient
and productive. President Obama wants to improve ALL the
schools, especially the lowest-achieving. The center piece of
Mitt Romney’s education policy is school choice. He wants to
take existing funds which are given without conditions to the states
and use them to encourage vouchers, charter schools, and the use of
online learning technology, and use federal incentives to have
high-stakes tests be a major determinant for the allocation of funds.
Home Foreclosures
President Obama has
designed programs to assist homeowners whose houses are in danger of
foreclosure. Mitt Romney would not act to prevent foreclosures
and he advocates letting housing “hit the bottom.”
Environment
President Obama supports
regulations to protect our air, water and food. Mitt Romney
advocates removing many of the existing protections. He has
stated “The idea of spending trillions and trillions of dollars to
try to reduce CO2 emissions is not the right course for us." He
would seek to have Congress amend the Clean Air Act and Clean Water
Act to assure that costs are taken into account and that, when
regulations are really necessary because of “compelling human
health reasons,” industry is given an extensive lead time to come
into compliance so that corporate interests are not sacrificed at the
altar of human health.
Mitt
Romney’s website does not contain the words “environment,”
“global warming” or “climate change” and the biggest laugh
line of his nomination acceptance speech mocked President Obama’s
promise to address the negative effects of climate change.
Unions
President Obama has fought
hard and weighed in firmly in favor of unions. He championed
the Employee Free Choice Act and secured a more politically
sympathetic National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). He issued an
executive order that federal agencies should consider requiring
union-friendly Project Labor Agreements and he weighed in during the
Wisconsin labor standoff in support of collective bargaining rights.
Mitt Romney, on the other hand, has stated he would, mostly via
executive order, on Day One, end preference for unionized companies
in government contracting; end Project Labor Agreements; fight to
repeal the Davis-Bacon Act; oppose the Employee Free Choice Act;
fight for right-to-work laws; undercut the ability of the NLRB to do
its job; and prevent unions from being able to spend member dues on
political activity without the express approval of the individual
members.
Finance
Reform
Wall
Street President
Obama supports regulations to protect consumers from abuse by
financial institutions as evidenced by passage of the Dodd-Frank Act
which included the establishment of the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau. Mitt Romney advocates the repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act
and its replacement with a “streamlined, modern regulatory
framework” that “creates a simple, predictable, and efficient
regulatory system.” No details are provided on what this
“modern regulatory framework” would look like or how he could get
such a system through the new Congress.
Campaign
President Obama supports a
constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision,
the DISCLOSE act which would force full disclosure of all funding
intended to influence our elections, and legislation prohibiting the
bundling of campaign contributions from lobbyists. While Mitt
Romney, legendary in his support of expansive corporate power,
originally stated Citizens United was "the right decision,"
he later stated that laws limiting political donations are too
restrictive. He prefers supporters contribute directly to
campaigns rather than to super PACs that do not always act as the
candidates wish.
Social
Safety Network
Mitt
Romney rants against a “culture of dependency” or an “entitlement
society” and advocates huge cuts in social programs such as
heating/cooling assistance, WIC, employment training, day care and
mental health services in order to maintain or bolster the military
and give tax breaks to the “job creators.” The GOP program
has been referred to as Social Darwinism, a model which was rejected
in the 20th century: reward the rich, penalize the poor and let
everyone else fend for themselves. The inevitable excesses of
free-market greed are freed from regulation in their plan.
President Obama believes
that a just society cares for children, the sick and the disabled,
feeds the hungry, and shelters the homeless. He rejects the
notion that each of us is on our own in a competitive contest for
survival. He supports the social safety network which includes
such protections as Unemployment Insurance and Food Stamps.
President Obama has
learned from the tragic consequences of the draconian
reductions in spending that we have seen in Europe and rejects that
path. He believes, as do Paul Krugman, Robert Reich and other
Keynesian economists, that if we stimulate the economy through aid to
the states and infrastructure spending, the debt will take care of
itself. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics; the
CBO; the Center of Economic and Policy Research; and the Economic
Policy Institute believe that every dollar spent on such benefits as
Unemployment Insurance and Food Stamps generates more than a dollar
in near-term GDP because people in need spend these grants
immediately.
For
example, every dollar spent on unemployment benefits generates an
estimated $1.63 in near-term GDP. Boosting food stamp payments
by $1 increases GDP by $1.73.
Taxes
Among the series of tax changes
Mitt Romney has proposed are: reducing individual income tax rates
across the board by 20 percent, maintaining the Bush
administration-era tax rate of 15 percent on investment income
from dividends
and capital gains
(and eliminating this tax entirely for those with annual incomes less
than $200,000), cutting the top tax rate on corporations from 35
percent to 25 percent, and eliminating the estate
tax and the alternative
minimum tax. Under the Ryan budget Mitt Romney would pay
less than 1% on his income.
Unlike
the examples above in which social safety net dollars spent generate
increases in GDP, the tax cuts Mitt Romney proposes generate
decreases in near-term GDP. Making the Bush tax cuts permanent
as he proposes generates only $0.31 in near-term GDP, cutting
the corporate tax rate generates only $0.30 and making dividend and
capital gains tax cuts permanent generates only $0.38.
Non-partisan analyses of Romney’s tax plan have estimated that it
could add more than $3 trillion to the federal deficit, and would
favor the highest-earning Americans, possibly raising annual taxes on
middle-class earners by as much as $2,000.
In
keeping with his understanding that a budget is a moral document,
President Obama believes that the deficit is best addressed by
reasonable progressive taxation and responsible economic stimulus.
In addition to eliminating the Bush tax cuts for those earning over
$250,000, calling on the wealthiest Americans to pay more in taxes,
President Obama’s plan would lower the nation’s corporate tax
rate to 28 percent while at the same time boosting overall revenue
from corporate taxation by banning numerous deductions and loopholes
that save companies tens of billions of dollars a year on their tax
bills.
Energy
Mitt Romney's energy plan is a
rehash of the top priorities of the Big Oil and Big Coal
representatives who recently joined him at a fundraiser: the end of
numerous safeguards for public health, the gutting of the Clean Air
and Clean Water Acts, the surrender of our public lands and offshore
areas to drilling and mining, and the destruction of tens of
thousands of American clean energy jobs.
The Obama Administration
has launched the most aggressive and comprehensive reforms to
offshore oil and gas regulation and oversight in U.S. history to
ensure that our nation can safely and responsibly expand development
of offshore energy resources. President Obama supports more
efficient cars, trucks, homes, factories and other buildings. The
Obama administration has just announced a new fuel efficiency
standard of 54.5 MPG for new vehicles sold in 2025. These new
standards will result in 570,000 new jobs, reduce oil consumption by
2.2 million barrels a day, save $1.7 trillion at the pump, and reduce
carbon pollution by more than 6 billion metric tons, a 10% drop.
Under President Obama’s leadership greenhouse gas emissions are
down to their lowest level in 20 years. We're using less oil; U.S.
wind power has doubled over the last four years; and solar has grown
by a factor of five.
The
Arts In a recent
interview in Politico, Mitt Romney stated his intention to cut all
federal funding for the National Endowment for the Arts, PBS and
NPR. While President Obama has decreased allocations for the
principal cultural agencies in recent budgets in a
recession-inspired attempt to reduce overall expenses, he has
included a modest increase in the allocations for the NEA, NEH and
other cultural organizations in his 2013 budget. There is a
clear impetus to use innovative programming and educational efforts
to achieve Obama administration goals in this area.
_________________________________________________________________
In the words of John Lewis speaking at the DNC convention, “My dear friends, your vote is precious, almost sacred. It is the most powerful, nonviolent tool we have to create a more perfect union ... Too many people struggled, suffered and died to make it possible for every American to exercise their right to vote.” I will not throw my vote away. I will vote for Barack Obama on November 6.